Compatriot Academy

Compatriot Academy

The CTMU or Metaformal Language-Environment ‘Mapping Mechanism:’ Dumbly I call It The “Meta-Linguistic Meta-Object”

Mr. Langan had fully fleshed it out and dispatched with the conception in two short paragraphs [which are more condensed, precise and of a huge metaphysical magnitude] ...

Gregory M. Wilford's avatar
Gregory M. Wilford
Mar 03, 2024
∙ Paid
Share

The CTMU or Metaformal Language-Environment ‘Mapping Mechanism:’ Dumbly I call It The “Meta-Linguistic Meta-Object”

“GRAMMAR AND SEMIMODELS”

 “ΓMU  is  a  self-dual  distribution  mapping,  the μ-morphism,  that  is  inwardly  involutive  and  consists  of  spacelike  metatemporal  parse  trees  which  produce  terminal  states  and  trajectories in T, but outwardly evolutive with respect to the time like linear trajectories thus  produced.  μ-morphism is  associated  with  a  rescaling  operation  called  conspansion, which  occurs  in  a  conspansive  manifold which  takes  the  form  of  a  syntactor  bundle, a  self-dual analogue of the topological construct known as a “fiber bundle”.   Conspansion   is   a   coupling   of   spacelike   dual   processes,   inner  expansion or d-ectomorphism,   a  one-to-many  mapping  which  outwardly  distributes  compact  identities  (states, points) to potentials, and collapse or d-  endomorphism,  a one-to-many dual mapping which inwardly   distributes   attributes   to   states   or   points.   (The   d-stands   for   “distributive”.)  The  self-dual  conspansion  morphism  corresponds  to  the  conspansive semimodel of  M,  which  models  derivation  and  is  associated  with  the  nonterminal  semilanguage Ls; it evolves discretely and in just the way that reality appears to evolve in the quantum-theoretic picture.”  (The Metaformal System: Completing the Theory of Language pp. 220-221)

“The grammatical language|universe coupling effected by M is self-dual in the sense that language  and  universe  are  just  different  aspects  of  shared  structure  in  which  they  everywhere  intersect.”  (The Metaformal System: Completing the Theory of Language p. 218)

Having Stumbled upon this Theory by haphazard lecturing, conversations, and bumbling Only to realize that Mr. Langan had fully fleshed it out and dispatched with the conception in two short paragraphs [which are more condensed, precise and of a huge metaphysical magnitude] And that It only makes sense within the ‘M’ Metaformal System and larger CTMU Model as credited here—This is cumulating My years of experience lecturing on Language, linguistic theory and linguistic structures to produce My Interpretation of the: “(ΓMU grammer: a  self-dual  distribution  mapping;  μ-morphism; involution; and Conspansion).” This Linguistic-Environment Mapping Theory as done by the Metaformal System published by Lagan but interpreted by Me through more traditional philosophies, which I see through the CTMU Lens. And which compounds all the major perspectives, theories, models I have come acrost of Language with the notable absence of Derrida and the Deconstructionist line. I am trying to impart a visualization via the Traditional philosophies of language and yet if You read, understand and perfectly visualize Langan’s paragraphs quoted above You needn’t read any further. If like Me You need to stupidly view these lines from parallax perspectives, like inspecting a model ship from close up to far away and from every conceivable angle; Then I urge You to read On. I think it is useful to perform comparative analysis in this way and to Know How Mr Langan fulfills All prior philosophies With Rapt Attention to detail and Systematized Mastery.

This then is what I “sacrilegiously” read Dumbly [vis-à-vis CTMU Dogma] call the Language-Environment ‘Mapping Mechanism’ or “Meta-Linguistic Meta-Object” as it was spurred in My Mind by reading Langan’s Metaformal System. All Credit is to Mr. Langan except where this Interpretation may garble His Own ideas which I have to come to fully recognize with further study. All blame in sight on the CTMU and sacrilegious content is My Own. So that the successes and failures of this interpretation may be put towards a ‘Wilfordian’ insight or else consigned to the dustbin of bad metaphysical intuition.

Enjoy…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Compatriot Academy to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
Gregory M. Wilford's avatar
A guest post by
Gregory M. Wilford
Christian man, labouring for the church and integrating the truths of scripture; sharing the Gospel. In hope of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Subscribe to Gregory
© 2025 Compatriot Academy
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture